The TRANSCEND CLL004 trial, published in The Lancet in 2023, presents compelling evidence for the use of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), particularly in patients who have exhausted other treatment options. Among a heavily pretreated group of trial participants, 88% were refractory to BTK inhibitors and 76% to Venetoclax, with a median of 5 prior lines of therapy.
The data suggest that liso-cel is highly effective in this difficult-to-treat patient population, with a complete response rate (CRR) of 18% and an overall response rate (ORR) of 43%. Notably, high-risk patients (i.e., those with TP53 deletion/mutation or unmutated IGHV)—who generally have poorer outcomes—achieved a CRR of 23% and ORR of 47%.
A further testament to liso-cel's efficacy is the MRD negativity rate of 63% in peripheral blood, suggesting deep responses.
The durability of the responses is impressive, with a median duration of response (mDOR) of 35.3 months and a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 26.2 months in MRD-negative patients. Median duration of CR was not reached.
Toxicity is manageable and predictable, and no new safety signals different from DLBCL trials were seen. Importantly, most deaths during the trial were due to disease progression, not treatment-related toxicity.
Despite the drug’s efficacy, there is a clear need to streamline the production of liso-cel. The 36-day wait from leukaphereses to infusion is particularly problematic for CLL patients at this stage of the disease. In total, the 15% drop off between leukaphereses and infusion is very telling; the company should focus on shortening this timeline to improve patient outcomes.
Based on the TRANSCEND CLL004 trial data, liso-cel offers a new treatment avenue for CLL patients who have exhausted other options. It is effective, provides durable responses, and has manageable toxicity, thus justifying its use in this difficult-to-treat population.
What are the benefits and challenges of using liso-cel in your practice? How does liso-cel compare with other newer treatments?
-
Branden Hsu2yrBiggest challenges are insurance issues, performance status, distance issues, social support, and most importantly, the lack of patients who are candidates for CAR-T -
Jason Salganick, IRONWOOD PHYSICIANS, PC2yrIn CLL there are limited options, CD20, BTK and BCL2, and then nothing really, so the addition of CAR-T as effective therapy is meeting a huge gap in necessary options. Show More
