Home > Focus Areas > Prostate Cancer Connect > Post
  • Saved
Prostate Cancer Treatment with Pencil Beam Proton Therapy Using Rectal Spacers sans Endorectal Balloons

Prostate Cancer Treatment with Pencil Beam Proton Therapy Using Rectal Spacers sans Endorectal Balloons

Source : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238133/

Matthew Forsthoefel, MD, 1 Ryan Hankins, MD, 2 Elizabeth Ballew, BS, 1 Cara Frame, MS, 1 David DeBlois, BS, 1 Dalong Pang, PhD, 1 Pranay Krishnan, MD, 3 Keith Unger, MD, 1 Keith Kowalczyk, MD, 2 John Lynch, MD, 2 Anatoly Dritschilo, MD, 1 Sean P. Collins, MD PhD, 1 and Jonathan W.


Conclusion: Early clinical outcomes of patients treated with PBS–PBT using Monte Carlo–based planning, fiducial placement, and rectal spacers sans endorectal balloons demonstrate minimal treatment-related toxicity with good oncologic outcomes. Rectal spacer stabilization without the use of endorectal balloons is feasible for the use of PBS–PBT.

  • 4yr
    Key Points
    • Source: International Journal of Particle Therapy
    • Conclusion/Relevance: “Early clinical outcomes of patients treated with PBS–PBT using Monte Carlo–based planning, fiducial placement, and rectal spacers sans endorectal balloons demonstrate minimal treatment-related toxicity with good oncologic outcomes. Rectal spacer stabilization without the use of endorectal balloons is feasible for the use of PBS–PBT [pencil-beam scanning-pencil beam radiotherapy].”
    • Investigators at Georgetown University Hospital reviewed records of 33 patients with localized prostate cancer who received placement of fiducials in the prostate and the insertion of a hydrogel rectal spacer.
    • During 18 months of follow-up, the most frequent complaint was urinary frequency. No high-grade late genitourinary toxicities occurred, although one grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity did. One treatment failure was found in a man with high-risk prostate cancer.
    • Hydrogel spacers are polyethylene glycol-based gels that form a geometrical expansion of the potential space situated at the posterior prostate and the anterior rectum. These spacers separate the prostate and rectum to a large degree and improve rectal dosimetric across nearly all dose–volume parameters.
    • The author write, “These dosimetric improvements have translated into particularly low rates of clinical GI toxicity and excellent patient-reported quality of life for intensity-modulated radiation treatments.”
    • Limitations of the current study include its short follow-up period and retrospective nature.